<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>TheLetterTwo.com - Latest Comments in Keeping An Eye Out For Those Tricky Twitter Spammers.</title><link>http://thelettertwo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://thelettertwo.disqus.com/keeping_an_eye_out_for_those_tricky_twitter_spammers/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:28:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Keeping An Eye Out For Those Tricky Twitter Spammers.</title><link>http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2009/09/28/keeping-an-eye-out-for-those-tricky-twitter-spammers/#comment-17746786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's one of the main problems that can cause some headaches when Twitter decides to go forward with business-focused accounts. The elimination of twitter spammers is the responsibility of the manufacturer - that being Twitter, but the point here is that the focus for business and people who want to follow others back, there are some clear signs as to who you shouldn't follow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ken Yeung</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:28:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keeping An Eye Out For Those Tricky Twitter Spammers.</title><link>http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2009/09/28/keeping-an-eye-out-for-those-tricky-twitter-spammers/#comment-17745744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You delineated some clear heuristics about how spam can be identified.  My question is: why do I have to manage this?  Why isn't Twitter trying to knock out spam more aggressively?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:59:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>